Search results

Plenty of adults whine, kid. Like your constant "omg its ugly LOL1!1" about anything un-Apple. I'd go into more detail but you're too stupid to understand and too boring to be bothered with. Toodles.

Your village called. They miss you. Now hush, adults are talking.

Oh God. Some of you need to get your head out of your backsides. Firstly, it's a browser, not a phone so you'll be able to stick it on any WM and - it looks like - S60 device later on. Secondly you can customise browsers with CSS sheets so they can look as good as you want. This rocks. Apple...

If you're getting it for free then, yeah, consider a Macbook.

Oh shoosh, you're just talking nonsense now. As for Vista, it's a disappointment. Given the choice I'd stay with XPSP2 (SP3 when it's released). No wonder MS are keen to get Windows 7 out as soon as possible.

A Mac's a waste of time for you then. The unit itself is too expensive and you're going to have to cough up at least another few hundred dollars for XP or Vista. If you can stretch to $1,200 get a 2.0Ghz Dell XPS M1330. If not the 1.66GHz goes for $999.

Which would be fine if MS made PCs. Which they don't. Next point please.

Meaningful input is always useful. :rolleyes: Don't mind geordisjd, he's a bit stuck in the 90's.

A lot of forums only allow you two lines or a small graphical sig, usually 50 pixels high by 150 wide.

Yeah, it's nearly as good - as you would expect considering Macs have pretty standard Intel architecture these days - but not quite considering the Mac isn't specifically designed to use Vista. I think Mossberg mentions this in his review. However, if you want to use Vista or XP on a Mac then...

Too much bad advice here, so... 1) Decide what you want the laptop for. 2) Decide how much you want to spend. 3) If you use primarily Windows based apps then by a Windows based laptop. There's no point using an emulator if you don't have to.

Well since you're spending $2,000 what difference does $40 make? Buy it from where it's most convenient.

Is that what your crystal ball tells you? LOL! Y halo thar reality check!

The first main reviews are in (from the usual favourites) and most are fairly ambiguous. Yes, they all say it's lovely and, yes, they all agree that it has major issues, the key one being the battery. According to the reviews you're only going to get about three hours out of it on heavy usage...

Solution to problem: 1) Go to user CP 2) Disable signatures 3) Shut the **** up

Not really since you fall into the desktop and laptop category like Tinman and I do. No arguments there but I'm not convinced that's the typical picture.

LOLno. That would be more relevant to the Airbook's feature set or, indeed, lack thereof. Like I said, Lenovos are iconic in their design. Not one for the gadflies I'm afraid. A lot of people aren't interested in having two PCs though and just want one that will do the job. Most of the people...

Lenovos are kind of iconic because they don't change the look. Sure, some people don't like their retro chic but then most people buy them for what they do and because they're so hard wearing. I have a T60 and it's brilliant. If you buy a PC because of what it looks like then you're sort of...

I think you need to compare the Airbook to the Lenovo ultraportables rather than the Sonys or Toshibas as that's the market they'll be competing against. Can't see it displacing the X61. Of course, what I really want is this...

Actually, my reply was a bit strong. That's what happens when you come in after a night on the piss and post in the wee small hours. You are, of course, right. It's up to you - if you want to get one feel free. At least you're being honest and admitting it's just a lovely toy.