I'm really on the fence, having a hard time deciding.
I posted this in another thread, but it was off topic (I know, big surprise coming from me
) so am looking for some input....
Sprint's already taxed network has been severely crippled with the influx of data hungry iPhone users since launch last October.
I did a minimal amount of research before initiating service @ 4S launch in October, erroneously just looking at the coverage maps they provide and taking them at face value, not looking for any real world user corroboration.
I consistently get about 1/3 (200 mbps) of the Sprint advertised minimum of 600 for 3G data speeds.
I have been able to get quarterly refunds for my premium "data service charges" on all lines for my family plan.up to this point, the customer service has been quite good, once you are able to side step the low level CSR's. I've been patiently waiting for the rollout of "network vision", and to see improvements in my area (San Diego, CA).
Feeling confident the iPhone 5 will incorporate 4G LTE comparability, I've been researching that as well.
In a nutshell, the ideal frequency for best LTE coverage is 800 mHz. It looks like Verizon and AT&T have wisely gobbled all that up, so as the latecomer after abandoning the failed WinMax 4G "experiment", Sprint was forced to buy chunks of 900mHz frequency. Still viable for LTE deployment, but not as efficient or far reaching, with a quicker decay leading to degraded signal performance.
It looks like they are currently building out in my area, with a scheduled roll out in early February.
Knowing this, I approached my contacts at Sprint to allow me an early upgrade this month for the iPhone 5, trying to leverage my my nearly 12 month long bad experience with current 3G data speeds as justification, with the thought that the forthcoming 4G improvement would make up for the trouble.
To my surprise, the refused. They offered instead to let me out of my contract without any ETF.
It blows me away they would offer to let me out of my 3 line contract penalty free as opposed to an early upgrade and new 2 year contract.
I'm actually considering jumping ship to VZ for the 5, but not stoked on the prospect of higher bills or capped data.
I guess I have to decide what's more important:
Sprint's unlimited (still crippled) data speeds with a 160 per month bill for 3 lines on three 4S's
VS
Verizon's capped blazing fast 4GTE for +- 200 monthly on 3 iPhone 5's
I posted this in another thread, but it was off topic (I know, big surprise coming from me

Sprint's already taxed network has been severely crippled with the influx of data hungry iPhone users since launch last October.
I did a minimal amount of research before initiating service @ 4S launch in October, erroneously just looking at the coverage maps they provide and taking them at face value, not looking for any real world user corroboration.
I consistently get about 1/3 (200 mbps) of the Sprint advertised minimum of 600 for 3G data speeds.
I have been able to get quarterly refunds for my premium "data service charges" on all lines for my family plan.up to this point, the customer service has been quite good, once you are able to side step the low level CSR's. I've been patiently waiting for the rollout of "network vision", and to see improvements in my area (San Diego, CA).
Feeling confident the iPhone 5 will incorporate 4G LTE comparability, I've been researching that as well.
In a nutshell, the ideal frequency for best LTE coverage is 800 mHz. It looks like Verizon and AT&T have wisely gobbled all that up, so as the latecomer after abandoning the failed WinMax 4G "experiment", Sprint was forced to buy chunks of 900mHz frequency. Still viable for LTE deployment, but not as efficient or far reaching, with a quicker decay leading to degraded signal performance.
It looks like they are currently building out in my area, with a scheduled roll out in early February.
Knowing this, I approached my contacts at Sprint to allow me an early upgrade this month for the iPhone 5, trying to leverage my my nearly 12 month long bad experience with current 3G data speeds as justification, with the thought that the forthcoming 4G improvement would make up for the trouble.
To my surprise, the refused. They offered instead to let me out of my contract without any ETF.
It blows me away they would offer to let me out of my 3 line contract penalty free as opposed to an early upgrade and new 2 year contract.
I'm actually considering jumping ship to VZ for the 5, but not stoked on the prospect of higher bills or capped data.
I guess I have to decide what's more important:
Sprint's unlimited (still crippled) data speeds with a 160 per month bill for 3 lines on three 4S's
VS
Verizon's capped blazing fast 4GTE for +- 200 monthly on 3 iPhone 5's